c7747467 used DeedTemplate._deeds in the deed placement check without
importing it, which broke the build.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Shrine boons read getItemOfferingInfo() and the banestone and bane
production paths read getItemBaneRank() on template.cacheTemplate.
The legacy parser only kept item_bane_rank when ACTIONRESPONSE is
4250517122; the cache parsers always read it. Parity shows this makes
no difference: every template outside that gate has bane rank 0.
Parity (offline, scripts/p14.py, 7586 templates): 0 differences in
item_offering_info and item_bane_rank. No value changes expected.
JSON-Refactor-Plan Task 1.4.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Consumers of the legacy ItemTemplate combat_health_full,
item_initial_charges and item_flags now read getCombatHealthFull(),
getItemInitialCharges() and getItemFlags() on template.cacheTemplate.
No consumer read the template's combat_health_current; the
combat_health_current reads are the Item's own field.
Parity (offline, scripts/p14.py, 7586 templates): 0 differences in
combat_health_current, combat_health_full, item_initial_charges and
item_flags ("None" dropped on both sides). No value changes expected.
JSON-Refactor-Plan Task 1.4.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Consumers of the legacy ItemTemplate item_wt, item_value and
item_base_name now read getItemWt(), getItemValue() and
getItemBaseName() on template.cacheTemplate.
Parity (offline, scripts/p14.py, 7586 templates): 0 differences in
item_wt, item_value and item_base_name. No value changes expected.
JSON-Refactor-Plan Task 1.4.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every consumer of the legacy ItemTemplate item_type now reads
template.cacheTemplate.getItemType(). Left on the legacy field: the
type count in dbItemHandler.LOAD_ITEM_TEMPLATES, which runs before the
bridge is linked. The charter checks already read DeedTemplate.
Parity (offline, static_item_templates vs the template
CObjectIndex.lookup picks, scripts/p14.py, 7586 templates: ITEM 4011,
DEED 880, RUNE 2695): 0 differences in item_type. No value changes
expected.
JSON-Refactor-Plan Task 1.4.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GuildCreationFinalizeHandler and UseCharterMsg now match charters by
DeedTemplate._deeds instead of the shared item_type getter, like the
other deed paths.
Value change: template 545 "Charter" (ITEM folder, CHARTER) no longer
counts as a charter. It is a base template that players can't get: its
only DB reference is static_vendor_items with vendorType 0, it has no
loot rows, and it is not in GuildCharterType.templateLookup, so guild
creation already rejected it.
JSON-Refactor-Plan Task 1.3.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Deed placement (ObjectActionMsgHandler, PlaceAssetMsgHandler) reads
deed_structure_id from DeedTemplate._deeds. The deed, employment
contract and charter type checks (PlaceAssetMsgHandler,
ActivateNPCMsgHandler, GuildCreationFinalizeHandler, UseCharterMsg,
Item.serialize) read item_type through the cache template bridge.
Charters go through the shared getter rather than _deeds because
template 545 "Charter" is a CHARTER in the ITEM folder.
Parity (offline, static_item_templates vs COBJECTS, scripts/p13.py,
881 templates: all 880 DEED plus ITEM 545): 0 differences in
item_type and deed_structure_id. Every DB DEED, EMPLOYMENTCONTRACT,
PETTOTEM and FURNITUREDEED id is in the DEED folder. No value changes
expected. No pet totem or furniture deed consumer reads template
fields, so neither changes.
JSON-Refactor-Plan Task 1.3.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Moves the warehouse-only check into validateBuildingPlacement, which every
city asset placement except siege equipment and trees passes through.
Matches client error 74, "Only buildings of war may be placed during a bane".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Placing a new warehouse discards the destroyed warehouse's rubble loot,
so defenders could deny attackers the loot by rebuilding mid-siege.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
city.warehouse is already null after a combat destruction, which threw in
DELETE_WAREHOUSE. If a new warehouse was placed it would have deleted that
one instead, so only a live (rank != -1) warehouse clears city.warehouse.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
destroyOrDerank nulled city.warehouse on destruction, so the loot click
found no warehouse and returned silently. The destroyed Warehouse is now
held in Warehouse.destroyedWarehouses keyed by the rubble building UUID
until it is looted empty, the rubble is destroyed, or the city places a
new warehouse. Contents are not persisted across a reboot.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
MagicBotandClaude Opus 5.5
FatBoy